mayo hosko: boxes with the wine glass logo on them means fragile
isidro mena: I had that set but I accedently let it fall and it broke
trissi nator: gold theres gold in them darn hills
mayo hosko: i think to get maximum use of the cargo space, Lego wants u to load the small cargo boxes with the Lego set box cargo onto the plane using the conveyor belt. then stack the cargo boxes at the back of one of the cargo holds to reduce floor space in the cargo holds, to make way for another cargo piece on its respective pallet. if u don't stack the cargo boxes at the back of the cargo hold, they conveyor belt is a useless part of the set
Jack Scott: the red wine glass means fragile
Furqaan Hansildaar: gold plates painted
Reed Boucher: to be onnest I think Lego should make another city airport sub theme because they havn't done that in years it feels like just re built the passenger plane from 2010 awesome how it looks
RandomReviewerBros!: I think the 2006 Passenger Plane set that I own is easily the longest plane of all time in terms of a minifig size plane. I mean Ive never been able to display it, its that large. I also own the cargo plane from 2008 and the Passenger Plane that came in the 2006 airport and those arent even close in size to the 2006 Passenger Plane set.
Jon Woodall: its need a police in there becuase what if some one trys to steal it
Vaderbricks: GREAT REVIEW!
Vijayakumar Subramani: I love it
Nicolas Nino: Message to MarzNet256,
In regards to the comment which you made about the cargo plane being 4 studs longer than #3182, you are incorrect, you have miscounted, there are three 2 stud long fuselage sections, a white one at the front of the plane just behind the roosterpit section and two green ones at the rear of the plane just in front of the tail section, making it not 4 but rather 6 studs longer than #3182. Instead of looking online, I recommend you simply look at the paper instructions which were included with the actual set, you cannot get more accurate than that.
MarzNet256: The cargo plane is 4 studs longer than the passenger plane from the lego city airport set 3182. It has two 2 stud long sections in the fuselage, in addition to the four 8 stud long sections in the fuselage. Checkout the LEGO building instructions online. This thing is big! This cargo plane set makes a fantastic complement to the city airport set (3182). I wish LEGO would make an an airport accessory set with with a proper push back tractor and push bar (3181-Passenger Plane has one but the tractor is not like the real thing). The new airport fire truck (60061) is also a killer addition to any airport set. You can get this set for $80-it's kinda a no brainer. Oh, and this thing will go up in value. Check the latest prices on set 3182, it costs' me 80 bones in 2011.
Nicolas Nino: SIGH OK, these are the facts so please READ CAREFULLY!
Fact 1: LEGO set 7893 (passenger plane) is "2" studs longer. - FACT If you count the number of studs in between the roosterpit piece and the rear (empennage) piece these will be the results which you will get for the aircrafts in the following sets: LEGO set 7893 (Passenger plane) - 40 studs. LEGO set 7894 (Airport) - 24 studs LEGO set 7734 (Cargo Plane) - 32 studs LEGO set 3182 (Airport) - 32 studs LEGO set 60022 (Cargo Terminal) - 38 studs
Final result: LEGO set 7893 (Passenger Plane) beats them all in size. - FACT
Fact 2: The wine glass symbol on the stickers simply indicates "FRAGILE". Any big company which ships out anything fragile will ship it in a box with the exact same symbol and will also have the word FRAGILE on the box in big letters. The difference is the wine glass symbol in reality have a crack on them. The one on the stickers does not, but they both indicate the same thing.
Fact 3: the rear landing gear on this aircraft just simply sucks. The main design of the airplane in this LEGO set has the complexity of a large modern LEGO aircraft and yet the rear landing gear looks like the landing gear of a plane made for toddlers. The rear landing gear design looks just like the design on those old LEGO airplans from the 80's and 90's. Not very complex.
MarzNet256: Is the plane longer than the one from the city airport set (3182)? It looks like it's the same size. Also, the city airport set (3182), which I bought new in 2011 for $80, is now going for $370 new. I have a feeling the same thing is going to happen to this cargo set.
Raf Animations: nope, the plane 7893 is bigger.
Raven 2537: im eleven and I still love legos like im 6
phillip rue: I have the Boeing 777 and it is massive so massive you have to hold it with two hands, but I got it when it was near the first release so it was about 780 dollars
LEGO City Cargo Terminal Review, Set 600225
out of 5
Go Green: Awww i want a movie!!
i love Ugly Betty.
It would be so awesome if there would be a movie
And if there isnt one then i would cry :'( KingHelianTheXVIII: 6.583 w00t Dex Ter's: 0.53 พี่เอกแน่เนย 555 เมือก่อนผอมๆหล่อๆ555 Sarcasm: @winterlandboy Well 435 pounds = 521euro's... it if 79 euro's more is "far too much to pay", ok then. Tom Močička: Cool but where it is exactly? patrick mcglone: I know it's 2016 but I just saw this video and I was almost crying cause it is so funny..lol Great video Matt. oh by the way I got your periodic Jeep shirt...Great idea and nice shirt. kyla P: I don't understand why people (specifically natural haired girls) need so many beauty products. I am a natural girl myself and I love hair stuff but man! Do we really need flexi rods, perm rods, so many clips, a large variety of butters, creams, moisturizers, leave ins, gels, and etc.... I'm not gonna lie I have almost every size of flexi rod and soooo many products, but when I think about how many I actually use on a daily basis, it's a handful of products and tools